|
GLTR.life

Living in Korea, Decoded

cut_01 image
cut_02 image
cut_03 image
cut_04 image
Immigration & Stay

Why has Korea's immigration office not changed for 30 years?

Foreigners who come to Korea hate one place: the immigration office. Its bad reputation goes way back. Even a 1996 article said it was unfriendly and got media criticism. In 2026 the situation is still the same. Let's look at the real reason why immigration complaints haven't changed for 30 years.

GLTR Life 편집팀6 minUpdated Sep 15, 2026

The immigration office has been called a “notorious place” since 1996. Then and now, the required documents change according to the officer’s discretion, so the officer’s word is the law. Why? Because foreigners living in Korea have little information while officers have a lot, and there is no standard procedure to limit administrative discretion. At the end of last year there were about 2.78 million foreigners staying in Korea, the highest ever. 2,159,052 (77.6%) are long‑term residents and the number is expected to exceed 3 million by 2030. Shouldn’t the immigration office, the “face” of Korea, be a bit kinder? But reality seems different. Satisfaction surveys show 98%, yet more people complain than praise. Online complaints keep coming and media like CBS and No Cut News keep pointing out problems. Experts suggest a pre‑screening window like a court registration office, a standard manual, and AI translation apps as solutions.

원문 보기
30-year record

It was already 'notorious' in 1996

In 1996, Dong‑A Ilbo reported the immigration office as a 'notorious place.' Back then, visa approval also depended on the officer’s discretion.

"Why does each officer ask for different documents?" This is a question foreigners ask. Even now the same question comes up. Lee Jaeh-ho, a lawyer at the immigrant center, says the cause is information gaps and unpredictable admin discretion. Even the same rule is read differently by each officer.

Improvement attempt timeline

Task force grew, but why does it feel the same?

There was a task force, but why isn’t it felt yet?

1996

First issue raised

Dong‑A Ilbo first reported the immigration office as a 'notorious place.'

Jan 2024

Complaint‑improvement task force formed

Seoul Immigration Office created a task force for complaint improvement.

2026

Task force reshuffled

The same team was reshuffled again. Repeated reshuffles signal delayed fundamental solutions.

2030 (forecast)

3‑million foreign resident era

If the structure doesn’t change, complaint issues will grow accordingly.

Solutions

Four alternatives to change the structure

So what should we change? Experts have practical suggestions.

1

1. Pre‑document review desk

Creating a desk that checks documents early, like a court registry, can cut re‑visits and rejections.

2

2. Set up a standard manual

A standard manual that everyone follows is needed to stop different interpretations.

3

3. Introduce AI translation apps

AI translation apps can reduce misunderstandings caused by language barriers.

4

4. Improve phone communication system

If the 1345 center directly connects to the responsible department, one call can solve the issue. Tip: Call ahead to check required documents before visiting to avoid wasted trips.

FAQ

Immigration complaints – know this

Why do required documents differ by immigration officer?
Because of info asymmetry and administrative discretion. Even with the same rules, each officer interprets them differently, so documents vary. Call ahead to check needed papers.
What to do if documents are rejected?
First, get the rejection reason in writing or text. Compare the embassy’s list with immigration’s request, fix the differences. You can also ask the 1345 center to connect you to the right department.
Will this issue improve in the future?
Seoul Immigration keeps reshuffling the task force. But reshuffling alone won’t fix the core lack of standard procedures. Structural changes like a pre‑document review desk are needed.
Why does the 98% satisfaction differ from on‑site feeling?
Because there’s a big gap between official surveys and online opinion. The survey’s target and method likely didn’t capture real complainants’ voices. Don’t just look at numbers; also consider on‑site voices.

community.comments 0

community.noComments

community.loginToComment